Differences between revisions 7 and 8
Revision 7 as of 2009-08-04 14:34:58
Size: 1272
Editor: RanaAdhikari
Comment:
Revision 8 as of 2009-08-04 14:38:54
Size: 1495
Editor: RanaAdhikari
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 23: Line 23:
For comparison, this means that our reference cavity has a sensitivity to vertical acceleration of 38 kHz/(m/s^2). The Ye/Hall vertical football cavities have a sensitivity of 10-20 kHz/(m/s^2).
Not such a big difference.

We have done some analysis of the Reference Cavity using COMSOL. We got the design parameters for the reference cavity from [http://www.ligo.caltech.edu/docs/D/D980670-00.pdf D980670]

Basic Model Parameters

  • T = 273 + 38 K (reference cavity can is kept at 38 C)

  • Spacer and mirrors made of Corning Fused Silica (7940) - in reality its probably 7980?
  • Uses: Structural Mechanics module, Heat Transfer module, & Materials Library

Eigenmodes

  1. Remove gravity
  2. No constraints (as if there's no wire)

    /EigenmodePlots

Vertical Sensitivity

  1. Constrain the grooves on the bottom in all 3 DOF.
  2. Add a load force on the spacer. F/V = -9.81 * 2200 (comsol likes a force/volume)

Deformation of the cylinder shows the actual shape. Color indicates displacement along the cavity axis.

The displacement of the left mirror is ~0.2 nm. So the sensitivity of the cavity length to vertical acceleration is 4 x 10^-10 (dL/L) / g. Next we have to consider the limited vibration isolation characteristics of the reference cavities stack and spring pendulum.

For comparison, this means that our reference cavity has a sensitivity to vertical acceleration of 38 kHz/(m/s2). The Ye/Hall vertical football cavities have a sensitivity of 10-20 kHz/(m/s2). Not such a big difference.

refcav1.png refcav1-zoom.png refcav1-zoom2.png

Reference_Cavity/FEA (last edited 2012-01-03 23:02:45 by localhost)