Differences between revisions 61 and 62
⇤ ← Revision 61 as of 2011-01-01 04:29:48 →
Size: 4314
Editor: KojiArai
Comment:
← Revision 62 as of 2011-01-01 04:30:26 → ⇥
Size: 3543
Editor: KojiArai
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 61: Line 61:
During the installation we like to align the beam spot onto ETMs while the beam goes through the
center of ITMs. However, if we put the actual ITMs at their correct positions, we will not be able
to see the spot at the end. If we remove the ITMs, the deflection of the beam is not provided, and
the correct alignment is not obtained.One possible solution is to put a wedged plate which has no
coating. If the wedge angle is the same as the final optics, the resulting beam has the desired
deflection angle. Even though the difference of the thickness shifts the beam in parallel, the
amount of shift is small and will not be a significant problem. The multiple reflections will allow
us to align the pick off beams as well. The candidate of the wedge plates are:

Contents

  1. ►Change in the optical layout
    1. Overview
    2. New Optical Layout plan
    3. Archive of the previous layouts
      1. - Previous layouts by Y. Aso
      2. - RSE layout by M. Smith
  2. ►Radii of curvature
  3. ►Effect of the wedge

►Change in the optical layout

Overview

The major change in the optical layout is the change of the cavity lengths for PRC and SRC. Since the modulation frequencies of 11MHz and 55MHz are used for the control of the interferometer, the lengths of PRC and SRC are significantly streched.

The actual modulation frequency is 11.065399MHz and its integer multiples. (based on the measurement of the MC length on 29th Sept, 2009)

This corresponds to the cavity lengths of about 6.8 m and 5.4 m for the PRC and SRC, respectively. For the correct amount of those lengths, visit IFO Modeling pages.

These cavity lengths result in numbers of modifications in the optical configuration:

  • In order to accomodate longer PRC and SRC, they have to be folded across the several optical tables.
  • The curvature radii of PRM and SRM are recalculated accordingly.
  • We are going to employ 2inch flat folding mirrors suspended with Enhanced LIGO/Advanced LIGO style Tip-Tilt suspensions with passive damping using eddy current.

New Optical Layout plan

[Latest] The new optical layout plan as of Dec 18, 2010. This reflects the latest installation of the optics in the vacuum chambers.

attachment:101218_40m_upgrade_layout.pdf

The main beam (red) and the pick-off beams (pale blue) indicated by three parallel lines has 18mm diameter. This indicates 6w, where w is the beam radius. The waist size of the arm cavity is about 3mm (1/e^2 radius) and the Rayleigh range is about 27m.

- To Do:

  • Output MMT

Archive of the previous layouts

- Previous layouts by Y. Aso

Previous optical layout by Y. Aso, attachment:40mUpgradeOpticalLayoutPlan01.pdf Zoom of the optical layout by Y. Aso, attachment:layout-zoom.pdf

The CAD files canbe found in /cvs/cds/caltech/users/aso/doc/CAD40m/2D/40mUpgradeOpticalLayoutSRMinITMX.dwb

This is VariCAD file. VariCAD is installed on rosalba and allegra.

  • *** Now KA switched from VariCAD/dwb to AutoCAD/dwg based work. Reason:

    • The original AutoCAD file is provided by M. Smith.

    • During the dwg->dwb conversion, a lot of information is lost.

    • Because of this, it turned out (for KA) that precise work in VariCAD is totally difficult.
    • Layer function of VariCAD is too weak to work with.

- RSE layout by M. Smith

attachment:40m_opt_layout_Orig_with_comment.pdf

►Radii of curvature

Here is the Mathematica notebook I wrote to calculate various parameters for the new recycling cavities.[attachment:NewRecyclingCavities.zip attachment:NewRecyclingCavities.zip] The PDF version is here: [attachment:NewRecCav.pdf attachment:NewRecCav.pdf] [attachment:GaussianOpticsTutorial.pdf attachment:GaussianOpticsTutorial.pdf]

This notebook explains how the cavity lengths, recycling mirror ROCs, PRM reflectivity are chosen.

Note: This calculation does not include the effect of the arm cavity. Thus the length of the cavities are slightly different from the actual desired values.

►Effect of the wedge

All of the main optics have wedge angles of several degrees in order to avoid undesirable interference of back-surface reflections into the main beam. Because of these wedges, we need to design the optical path slightly shifted from the normal angles.In order to incorporate the effect of the wedges, a Mathematica code to calculate the beam deflections has been developed. attachment:wedge_analysis.nb

attachment:ITMY_wedge_1deg.png [attachment:wedge.pdf attachment:wedge.pdf]

Optical_Layout (last edited 2018-07-30 17:48:17 by StevevassATligoDOTorg)