Differences between revisions 45 and 46
Revision 45 as of 2010-05-09 07:37:23
Size: 4724
Editor: KojiArai
Comment:
Revision 46 as of 2010-05-09 07:41:09
Size: 4786
Editor: KojiArai
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 21: Line 21:
'''[Latest]''' The new optical layout plan as of Feb 03, 2010.
# attachment:100506_40m_upgrade_layout-ALL.png
# [del | get | view] (287.5 KB) attachment:100506_40m_upgrade_layout-BSC.png
# [del | get | view] (136.5 KB) attachment:100506_40m_upgrade_layout-ETMX.png
# [del | get | view] (118.6 KB) attachment:100506_40m_upgrade_layout-ETMY.png
# [del | get | view] (197.1 KB) attachment:100506_40m_upgrade_layout-IMC.png
# [del | get | view] (206.4 KB) attachment:100506_40m_upgrade_layout-ITMX.png
# [del | get | view] (175.7 KB) attachment:100506_40m_upgrade_layout-ITMY.png
# [del | get | view] (214.0 KB) attachment:100506_40m_upgrade_layout-OMC.png
# [del | get | view] (1197.9 KB) attachment:100506_40m_upgrade_layout.pdf
'''[Latest]''' The new optical layout plan as of May 06, 2010.

attachment:100506_40m_upgrade_layout.pdf

<<ImageLink(100506_40m_upgrade_layout-ALL.png, Upgrade 09/Optical Layout,width=400)>>
<<ImageLink(100506_40m_upgrade_layout-OMC.png, Upgrade 09/Optical Layout,width=400)>>
<<ImageLink(100506_40m_upgrade_layout-IMC.png, Upgrade 09/Optical Layout,width=400)>>
<<ImageLink(100506_40m_upgrade_layout-BS.png, Upgrade 09/Optical Layout,width=400)>>
<<ImageLink(100506_40m_upgrade_layout-IMTX.png,Upgrade 09/Optical Layout,width=400)>>
<<ImageLink(100506_40m_upgrade_layout-ITMY.png,Upgrade 09/Optical Layout,width=400)>>
<<ImageLink(100506_40m_upgrade_layout-ETMX.png,Upgrade 09/Optical Layout,width=400)>>
<<ImageLink(100506_40m_upgrade_layout-ETMY.png,Upgrade 09/Optical Layout,width=400)>>
Line 34: Line 36:
'''- To Do:''' * PRM/SRM/BS/ETMs wedge arrangements and reflections  '''- To Do:''' * PRM/SRM/BS/ETMs wedge arrangements and reflections
Line 36: Line 39:
 * Work at around OMC 
 * Output MMT 
 * Work at around OMC
 * Output MMT
Line 62: Line 65:
<<Anchor(wedge)>>All of the main optics have wedge angles of several degrees in order to avoid undesirable interference of back-surface reflections into the main beam. Because of these wedges, we need to design the optical path slightly shifted from the normal angles.In order to incorporate the effect of the wedges, a Mathematica code to calculate the beam deflections has been developed. attachment:wedge_analysis.nb During the installation we like to align the beam spot onto ETMs while the beam goes through the center of ITMs. However, if we put the actual ITMs at their correct positions, we will not be able to see the spot at the end. If we remove the ITMs, the deflection of the beam is not provided, and the correct alignment is not obtained.One possible solution is to put a wedged plate which has no coating. If the wedge angle is the same as the final optics, the resulting beam has the desired deflection angle. Even though the difference of the thickness shifts the beam in parallel, the amount of shift is small and will not be a significant problem. The multiple reflections will allow us to align the pick off beams as well. The candidate of the wedge plates are:

attachment:ITMY_wedge_1deg.png
<<Anchor(wedge)>>All of the main optics have wedge angles of several degrees in order to avoid undesirable interference of back-surface reflections into the main beam. Because of these wedges, we need to design the optical path slightly shifted from the normal angles.In order to incorporate the effect of the wedges, a Mathematica code to calculate the beam deflections has been developed. attachment:wedge_analysis.nb During the installation we like to align the beam spot onto ETMs while the beam goes through the center of ITMs. However, if we put the actual ITMs at their correct positions, we will not be able to see the spot at the end. If we remove the ITMs, the deflection of the beam is not provided, and the correct alignment is not obtained.One possible solution is to put a wedged plate which has no coating. If the wedge angle is the same as the final optics, the resulting beam has the desired deflection angle. Even though the difference of the thickness shifts the beam in parallel, the amount of shift is small and will not be a significant problem. The multiple reflections will allow us to align the pick off beams as well. The candidate of the wedge plates are: attachment:ITMY_wedge_1deg.png


►Change in the optical layout

Overview

The major change in the optical layout is the change of the cavity lengths for PRC and SRC. Since the modulation frequencies of 11MHz and 55MHz are used for the control of the interferometer, the lengths of PRC and SRC are significantly streched.

The actual modulation frequency is 11.065399MHz and its integer multiples. (based on the measurement of the MC length on 29th Sept, 2009)

This corresponds to the following lengths of the cavities:

  • PRC: 6.773 m

  • SRC: 5.419 m

This change result in numbers of modifications in the optical configuration:

  • In order to accomodate longer PRC and SRC, they have to be folded across the several optical tables.
  • The curvature radii of PRM and SRM are recalculated accordingly.
  • We are going to employ 2inch flat folding mirrors suspended with Enhanced LIGO/Advanced LIGO style Tip-Tilt suspensions with passive damping using eddy current.

New Optical Layout plan

[Latest] The new optical layout plan as of May 06, 2010.

attachment:100506_40m_upgrade_layout.pdf

100506_40m_upgrade_layout-ALL.png 100506_40m_upgrade_layout-OMC.png 100506_40m_upgrade_layout-IMC.png 100506_40m_upgrade_layout-BS.png 100506_40m_upgrade_layout-IMTX.png 100506_40m_upgrade_layout-ITMY.png 100506_40m_upgrade_layout-ETMX.png 100506_40m_upgrade_layout-ETMY.png

The meain beam (red) and the pick-off beams (pale blue) indicated by three parallel lines has 18mm diameter. This indicates 6w, where w is the beam radius. The waist size of the arm cavity is about 3mm (1/e^2 radius) and the Rayleigh range is about 27m.

- To Do: * PRM/SRM/BS/ETMs wedge arrangements and reflections

  • Video: check view angles
  • Work at around OMC
  • Output MMT

Archive of the previous layouts

- Previous layouts by Y. Aso

Previous optical layout by Y. Aso, attachment:40mUpgradeOpticalLayoutPlan01.pdf Zoom of the optical layout by Y. Aso, attachment:layout-zoom.pdf

The CAD files canbe found in /cvs/cds/caltech/users/aso/doc/CAD40m/2D/40mUpgradeOpticalLayoutSRMinITMX.dwb

This is VariCAD file. VariCAD is installed on rosalba and allegra.

  • *** Now KA switched from VariCAD/dwb to AutoCAD/dwg based work. Reason:

    • The original AutoCAD file is provided by M. Smith.
    • During the dwg->dwb conversion, a lot of information is lost.

    • Because of this, it turned out (for KA) that precise work in VariCAD is totally difficult.
    • Layer function of VariCAD is too weak to work with.

- RSE layout by M. Smith

attachment:40m_opt_layout_Orig_with_comment.pdf

►Radii of curvature

Here is the Mathematica notebook I wrote to calculate various parameters for the new recycling cavities.[attachment:NewRecyclingCavities.zip attachment:NewRecyclingCavities.zip] The PDF version is here: [attachment:NewRecCav.pdf attachment:NewRecCav.pdf] [attachment:GaussianOpticsTutorial.pdf attachment:GaussianOpticsTutorial.pdf]

This notebook explains how the cavity lengths, recycling mirror ROCs, PRM reflectivity are chosen.

►Effect of the wedge

All of the main optics have wedge angles of several degrees in order to avoid undesirable interference of back-surface reflections into the main beam. Because of these wedges, we need to design the optical path slightly shifted from the normal angles.In order to incorporate the effect of the wedges, a Mathematica code to calculate the beam deflections has been developed. attachment:wedge_analysis.nb During the installation we like to align the beam spot onto ETMs while the beam goes through the center of ITMs. However, if we put the actual ITMs at their correct positions, we will not be able to see the spot at the end. If we remove the ITMs, the deflection of the beam is not provided, and the correct alignment is not obtained.One possible solution is to put a wedged plate which has no coating. If the wedge angle is the same as the final optics, the resulting beam has the desired deflection angle. Even though the difference of the thickness shifts the beam in parallel, the amount of shift is small and will not be a significant problem. The multiple reflections will allow us to align the pick off beams as well. The candidate of the wedge plates are: attachment:ITMY_wedge_1deg.png

[attachment:wedge.pdf attachment:wedge.pdf]

Optical_Layout (last edited 2018-07-30 17:48:17 by StevevassATligoDOTorg)