|
Size: 2541
Comment:
|
← Revision 45 as of 2012-03-09 02:31:12 ⇥
Size: 3062
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 59: | Line 59: |
| ------------------- | |
| Line 62: | Line 62: |
| {{attachment:Feb17OLT.png}} * Frequency noise TF {{attachment:Feb17PMcouple.png}} * Amplitude noise TF {{attachment:Feb17AMcouple.png}} |
{{attachment:Feb24OLT.png}} * Frequency noise coupling {{attachment:Feb24FMcoupling.png}} * Amplitude noise coupling {{attachment:Feb24AMcoupling.png}} |
| Line 72: | Line 73: |
| {{attachment:Feb17TF1.png}} <<BR>> | {{attachment:Feb24TFMICH.png}} <<BR>> |
| Line 75: | Line 76: |
| {{attachment:Feb17TF2.png}} <<BR>> | {{attachment:Feb24TFPRCL.png}} <<BR>> |
| Line 78: | Line 79: |
| {{attachment:Feb17TF3.png}} | {{attachment:Feb24TFSRCL.png}} |
| Line 81: | Line 82: |
| {{attachment:Feb20Seis.png}} | {{attachment:Mar7Seis.png}} |
| Line 83: | Line 85: |
| * Seismic Noise Estimation (MICH, PRCL, SRCL) {{attachment:Feb20Seis2.png}} * Quantum Noise Estimation (correctness unknown) |
* '''Quantum Noise Estimation''' (correctness unknown) - both open loop and closed loop - full lines are adding all contributions from all sensors (weighted by their TF to that DOF) - dashed lines are only contribution from sensor corresponding to that DOF - in open loop, full line and dash overlap as expected |
| Line 87: | Line 97: |
------------------- == How different between getTF, pickleTF ol, bare sensors, and Dof sensors? == * TF comparison {{attachment:Feb26comparison1.png}} {{attachment:Feb26comparison2.png}} {{attachment:Feb26comparison3.png}} {{attachment:Feb26comparison4.png}} |
Lentickle model for C1
Scripts are found in iscmodeling/LentickleC1
Purpose
- To get the OLTs
- To get noise budget
- Sensing matrix with loops
Main script to execute
C1lentickle.m builds the Optickle model, then inclides the loops defined by C1cucumber.m The Optickle model for C1 is same as Kiwamu's scripts, optC1:
- optC1.m ... Optickle model
- paramC1DRMI.m ... physical parameters for optC1
- probesC1_00.m ... probes of the model
C1cucumber setting
- Sensors
REFL 3I1
REFL 3Q1
AS I2
AS Q2
AS DC
AS 3I2
AS 3Q2
- Input Matrix
DoF |
REFL3I1 |
REFL3Q1 |
ASI2 |
ASQ2 |
ASDC |
AS3I2 |
AS3Q2 |
MICH |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
PRCL |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
SRCL |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
- Output Matrix
Drive |
MICH |
PRCL |
SRCL |
IX |
1 |
0 |
0 |
IY |
-1 |
0 |
0 |
BS |
0 |
0 |
0 |
PR |
0 |
1 |
0 |
SR |
0 |
0 |
1 |
AM |
0 |
0 |
0 |
PM |
0 |
0 |
0 |
OSC AM |
0 |
0 |
0 |
OSC PM |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- Control Filters
MICH |
PRCL |
SRCL |
ZPK(10, 1000, 1)* ZPK(5, 1, 5) |
ZPK(10, 1000, 1)* ZPK(50, 1, 50) |
ZPK(10, 1000, 1)* ZPK(50, 1, 50) |
bodeplot of the filters These filters already have pendulum compensation. Therefore in cucumber, you don't need the pendulum compensation (mirrFilt) matrix. Here we use a flat (unity) mirrFilt.
* Mechanical transfer function dampRes = [-0.1 + 1i, -0.1 - 1i];
opt = setMechTF(opt, 'IX', zpk([], par.w * dampRes, 1 / par.mass));
Results
- OLT
- Frequency noise coupling
- Amplitude noise coupling
- Transfer functions from each optics to each DoF
MICH
PRCL
SRCL
- Seismic Noise estimation (MICH)
Quantum Noise Estimation (correctness unknown)
- both open loop and closed loop
- full lines are adding all contributions from all sensors (weighted by their TF to that DOF)
- dashed lines are only contribution from sensor corresponding to that DOF
- in open loop, full line and dash overlap as expected
How different between getTF, pickleTF ol, bare sensors, and Dof sensors?
- TF comparison
