|
Size: 7451
Comment:
|
Size: 7880
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 35: | Line 35: |
| '''Status Quo Summary''' * Noise: the current noise level is close to the DAC noise. We need less noise. * Saturation, the output of the monitor is closest to saturation, with RMS ~3V, a factor of 5 from 15V. * Gain: We have about 200, at least 100 gain in the passband, enough to overcome the ADC noise (300nV/rtHz * 200 >> 4uV/rtHz). '''The Design''' |
|
| Line 75: | Line 80: |
| '''Gain''' From [[attachment:nOUT.pdf]], we can see that in the pass band, the signal goes up to 0.1V/rtHz to 1V/rtHz. The input signal in the band was between 0.001 to 0.01 V/rtHz [[attachment:CD-in-out.pdf]]. So the gain is at least 100 (we designed 200). Amplifying the 300nV/rtHz DAC noise by at least 100, it is very sufficient to overcome the 4uV/rtHz ADC noise. | '''Gain''' From [[attachment:nOUT.pdf]], we can see that in the pass band, the signal goes up to 0.1V/rtHz to 1V/rtHz. The input signal in the band was between 0.001 to 0.01 V/rtHz [[attachment:CD-in-out.pdf]], so the gain in the passband is at least 100 (we designed 200. It could be 200, eyeballed from the log plot). Amplifying the 300nV/rtHz DAC noise by at least 100 times, it will be sufficient to overcome the 4uV/rtHz ADC noise. |
SUS Noise Monitor
Design goals
- No saturations as long as the coil driver input signals are at the 99th percentile or below.
- Provide enough gain (at 20 Hz and above) to boost the DAC noise above ADC noise (by what factor?).
- Is it possible to measure the coil driver noise? Or alternatively, with what SNR should the DAC noise be measured?
Design inputs
DAC noise model: page 6 of G1401399.
PUM coil driver transfer function. LISO models are available here.
- The worst-case dewhitening state for the noise monitor is ACQ off, LP on.
ADC noise level, about 4 uV/rtHz. (Reference: page 6 of T070213)
Coil driver input spectra, G1801540.
The aLIGO sensitivity curve, T1500293.
Quad suspension PUM transfer function: above a few Hz, about 3e-8*(10 Hz/f)4 m/N. (Reference: T1100595)
DAC noise
The strain of DAC noise The DAC noise model is given in the design inputs above G1401399. We calculate the output current of the coil driver using the Liso models given above in the design input here. Since the DAC is the lowest when ACQ is off and LP is on, it is the worst case for our design of the noise monitor. Hence, ACQ on, LP off is the state we use to evaluate our design. Then we calculate how much driving force can be generated from the output current of the coil driver according to the block diagram of the PUM coil driver. Finally, we calculate how much strain is produced out of the DAC noise using the mechanical transfer function at T1100595, given in the design input above and estimated to be about 3e-8*(10 Hz/f)4 m/N. The arm length is 4000m and, we have 4 optics with 4 coil drivers on each, combined to 16 incoherent noise sources. Thus, we multiply individual coil driver noise with 4. The DAC noise is plotted DAC-noise-strain.pdf, compared with the aLIGO strain noise. The "10" in DAC-noise-strain-10 means the noise when LP is ON and ACQ is OFF. The aLIGO-strain-requirement curve is the aLIGO noise curve divided by 10. We want the internal noise of our noise monitor to be lower than the DAC noise.
DAC noise and different states of the coil driver A marginal observation has been made comparing the DAC noises of different states of the coil driver. A plot comparing the noises under three different states with the aLIGO noise has been made DAC-noise-CDstates-strain.pdf. Similar as above, "00" means both LP and ACQ are turned off; "01" means that LP is OFF and ACQ is ON. We can see that, at 20 Hz, when the acq turns on or lp turns off, DAC noise increases by roughly a factor of 10. If they both happen, DAC noise increases by almost a factor of 100. This comes from the change of the current transfer function with coil driver states. When you turn on the acq, or turn off the lp, you get more current out of the coil driver for the same voltage. Plots of the transfer functions: tf-CDstates.pdf.
General Design Ideas
- The DAC frequencies we need to monitor is 20 - 100 Hz, above 100 Hz the DAC noise is too much attenuated by the mechanical transfer function.
The noise monitor will pick up differential signal from the output voltage of the coil driver. This is computed using the input data at L1:SUS-ETMY_L2_MASTER_OUT_LL_DQ, given in the design input G1801540. The input and output of the coil driver is plotted as CD-in-out.pdf.
- We need to avoid saturation. In order to see if the design saturates, we compute the RMS of the output at each opamp and make sure it is far enough from ± 15 V. A plot should be made on the accumulative RMS to infinity.
- We want enough gain in the passband such that the DAC noise (300nV/rtHz) overwhelms the ADC noise (4uV/rtHz). However, we want to allocate the gain reasonably in the circuit to avoid both saturation and too much noise.
According to CD-in-out.pdf, most of the input signal lies below 20 Hz. Thus, to avoid saturation, we need high-quality high-pass filtering at 20 Hz.
Design
Status Quo Summary
- Noise: the current noise level is close to the DAC noise. We need less noise.
- Saturation, the output of the monitor is closest to saturation, with RMS ~3V, a factor of 5 from 15V.
Gain: We have about 200, at least 100 gain in the passband, enough to overcome the ADC noise (300nV/rtHz * 200 >> 4uV/rtHz).
The Design v1-design.filv1-transfer-function.pdfv1-noise.pdf
Currently we have the layout that starts from a Sallen-Key high-pass filter before the instrumental amplifier, followed by another four Sallen-Key high pass filters. These high-pass filters cut off at 20 Hz. After that, we have a second-order low-pass Sallen-Key filter cutting off at 100Hz. We spread the gain across the stages: 10 in the opamp, 5 in the high pass filters and 4 in the low pass filters. The Liso model is shown in v1-design.fil, transfer function v1-transfer-function.pdf.
Noises As we can see from v1-noise.pdf, we need lower noises, a bigger gap between the noisemon noise and the DAC noise, throughout the passband of 20-100Hz. The dominating noise sources are, as is printed out by Liso,
From 20 Hz onwards noise by OP:I+ (HP3OP1) dominates, the current noise of the third high pass filter.
From 20.46 Hz onwards noise by OP:I+ (HP1OP1N) dominates, the current noise of the first high pass filter.
Saturation nOUT.pdf: Output of the noise monitor.
nOUT1P.pdf: Output of the first HP filter (before the instrumental amplifier)
nOUT2.pdf: Output of the instrumental amplifier
nOUT3.pdf: Output of the second HP filter
nOUT4.pdf: Output of the third HP filter
nOUT5.pdf: Output of the fourth HP filter
nOUTHP.pdf: Output of the fifth HP filter (the last one)
nR1B_b.pdf: Output of one of the instrumental amplifier opamps
nR2T_l.pdf: Output of one of the instrumental amplifier opamps
We use the output voltage from the coil driver as input (CD-in-out.pdf), and calculate the output spectrums of each op-amp. The spectrums are plotted above, and the RMS's are calculated as below. The largest RMS we get is at the output of the noise monitor, ~3V, with a factor of 5 from saturation voltage 15V.
Net |
RMS (V) |
nOUT4-RMS |
0.432315124588 |
nOUT5-RMS |
0.643246121059 |
nOUT2-RMS |
0.240073255873 |
nR1B_b-RMS |
0.0120037037306 |
nOUT3-RMS |
0.297676760906 |
nOUT1P-RMS |
0.0240074110464 |
nOUTHP-RMS |
1.02574217346 |
nOUT-RMS |
3.02604967811 |
nR2T_l-RMS |
0.0360111135805 |
Gain From nOUT.pdf, we can see that in the pass band, the signal goes up to 0.1V/rtHz to 1V/rtHz. The input signal in the band was between 0.001 to 0.01 V/rtHz CD-in-out.pdf, so the gain in the passband is at least 100 (we designed 200. It could be 200, eyeballed from the log plot). Amplifying the 300nV/rtHz DAC noise by at least 100 times, it will be sufficient to overcome the 4uV/rtHz ADC noise.
