Differences between revisions 2 and 9 (spanning 7 versions)
Revision 2 as of 2018-08-06 06:39:12
Size: 831
Comment:
Revision 9 as of 2018-08-06 07:56:04
Size: 1270
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 10: Line 10:
  * The worst-case dewhitening state for the noise monitor is ACQ off, LP on.  * The worst-case dewhitening state for the noise monitor is ACQ off, LP on.
Line 15: Line 15:
Data:
Plot:

 * 1G: [[attachment:CDtrans-1G.pdf]]
 * 1k: [[attachment:CDTrans-1k.pdf]]
 * The coil driver attenuates about 1/5 in the 1k domain. The original design of the noise monitor amplifies about 200 times ([[https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-D070480/public|source]]). Thus, the signal is amplified about 40 times from the input of the coil driver. Compared with the given input signal, it seems the saturation is mainly caused by low frequency signals below 10Hz.

SUS Noise Monitor

Design goals

  • No saturations as long as the coil driver input signals are at the 99th percentile or below.
  • Provide enough gain (at 20 Hz and above) to boost the DAC noise above ADC noise.

Design inputs

  • DAC noise model: page 6 of G1401399.

  • PUM coil driver transfer function. LISO models are available here.

  • The worst-case dewhitening state for the noise monitor is ACQ off, LP on.
  • ADC noise level, about 4 uV/rtHz. (Reference: T070213)

  • Coil driver input spectra, G1801540.

Coil driver transfer function

  • 1G: CDtrans-1G.pdf

  • 1k: CDTrans-1k.pdf

  • The coil driver attenuates about 1/5 in the 1k domain. The original design of the noise monitor amplifies about 200 times (source). Thus, the signal is amplified about 40 times from the input of the coil driver. Compared with the given input signal, it seems the saturation is mainly caused by low frequency signals below 10Hz.

Electronics/NoiseMonitor (last edited 2020-02-06 00:41:08 by DuotaoATligoDOTorg)