Differences between revisions 12 and 17 (spanning 5 versions)
⇤ ← Revision 12 as of 2018-08-06 08:31:05 →
Size: 1837
Editor: DuotaoATligoDOTorg
Comment:
← Revision 17 as of 2018-08-07 02:39:38 → ⇥
Size: 2372
Editor: RanaadhikariATligoDOTorg
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
 * Provide enough gain (at 20 Hz and above) to boost the DAC noise above ADC noise.  * Provide enough gain (at 20 Hz and above) to boost the DAC noise above ADC noise (by what factor?).
 * Is it possible to measure the coil driver noise? Or alternatively, with what SNR should the DAC noise be measured?
Line 20: Line 22:
=== Some design thoughts === === Some design thoughts 8/5 ===
Line 25: Line 27:
 * If we have a good filter, according to the input spectrum, maybe applying a gain of 500? This allows the 300nV DAC noise to overwhelm the 4uV ADC noise. This also keeps the signal away from saturation, according to the given coil driver input spectrum.  * If we have a good filter, according to the input spectrum, maybe applying a gain of 500? This allows the 300nV DAC noise to overwhelm the 4uV ADC noise. This also keeps the signal away from saturation, according to the given coil driver input spectrum. Do we have to worry about the strong mode at 500 Hz in both H1 and L1?
 * Trying to learn about active filters. Would we consider using them?

=== Decisions 8/6 ===
 * Start from the existing design but
  * spread the gain across the stages to manage risk of saturation
  * Move the low frequency cutoff to 20Hz
 * Move on to active filters for better stop band to pass band transition

SUS Noise Monitor

Design goals

  • No saturations as long as the coil driver input signals are at the 99th percentile or below.
  • Provide enough gain (at 20 Hz and above) to boost the DAC noise above ADC noise (by what factor?).
  • Is it possible to measure the coil driver noise? Or alternatively, with what SNR should the DAC noise be measured?

Design inputs

  • DAC noise model: page 6 of G1401399.

  • PUM coil driver transfer function. LISO models are available here.

  • The worst-case dewhitening state for the noise monitor is ACQ off, LP on.

  • ADC noise level, about 4 uV/rtHz. (Reference: T070213)

  • Coil driver input spectra, G1801540.

Coil driver transfer function

Some design thoughts 8/5

  • The current design uses a couple passive filters, interleaved by amplifiers. Passband 0.482Hz - 482Hz, gain ~200. Combining with the coil driver transfer function, the signal is amplified about 40 times from the input of the coil driver. Compared with the given input signal, it seems the saturation is mainly caused by low frequency signals below 10Hz.
  • Following Rana's idea on Friday: a pair of low/high pass filter + instrument amplifier (where we get the gain), what else do we need?
    • Sharper cutoff (Higher Q)? Perhaps higher order passive filters?
    • Noise? Input impedance?
  • If we have a good filter, according to the input spectrum, maybe applying a gain of 500? This allows the 300nV DAC noise to overwhelm the 4uV ADC noise. This also keeps the signal away from saturation, according to the given coil driver input spectrum. Do we have to worry about the strong mode at 500 Hz in both H1 and L1?
  • Trying to learn about active filters. Would we consider using them?

Decisions 8/6

  • Start from the existing design but
    • spread the gain across the stages to manage risk of saturation
    • Move the low frequency cutoff to 20Hz
  • Move on to active filters for better stop band to pass band transition

Electronics/NoiseMonitor (last edited 2020-02-06 00:41:08 by DuotaoATligoDOTorg)