Differences between revisions 21 and 22
Revision 21 as of 2013-09-22 20:24:36
Size: 1041
Comment:
Revision 22 as of 2013-09-22 20:25:07
Size: 1047
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
= Tuning FP modal frequencies using a thermal phase correction feedback system = = Tuning FP modal frequencies using a thermal phase error correction feedback system =

Tuning FP modal frequencies using a thermal phase error correction feedback system

Goal

To compensate for imperfections that arise due to optical inhomogeneities in the arm cavity mirrors by designing and implementing a thermal compensation system.

The lessons learned from this exercise will help in designing/implementing a similar kind of system for the folding mirrors in the recycling cavities.

Fact-finding

  1. What are the ideal cavity parameters? (a reference to compare the different heating models)
  2. Sources of inhomogeneity : (i) Deviation from mirror specs (ii) Thermal effects due to circulating arm cavity power (iii) Surface roughness
  3. Increase or decrease RoC of the ETM to correct for inhomogeneities (choose between the ring-heater design and the VIRGO chrocc design)
  4. Desired tuneable range and achievable range
  5. Effect of heating at 1064nm and 532nm
  6. Best heating profile
  7. Practical/hardware limitations in implementing

Modelling using SIS/COMSOL

Advanced_Techniques/Adaptive_Thermal_Compensation (last edited 2013-11-16 13:50:04 by ManasadevithirugnanasambandamATligoDOTorg)